|
Many
interviewers prefer to ask a candidate to analyze and solve a complex
problem during the interview. This is a waste of valuable interview time
and in most cases is not job related because the candidate would have
more time in the actual job setting to analyze and solve the problem.
The problem analysis exercise method described in the tool kit
administers this type of exercise prior to or after the actual
interview.
Determining the
level of Problem Analysis Ability for the Target Job
Your job analysis has
determined that the position requires the ability to analyze some sort
of problem. The question then becomes “Analyze what problem and what
level of problem analysis ability is necessary upon entry?” Listed below
are some examples:
-
Technical
-
Supervisory
-
Administrative
-
Policy and Procedures
-
Organizational
-
Planning
-
Staffing
Developing the
exercise
This exercise requires
the candidate to analyze a problem similar to those that are performed
on the job. Thus, the exercise must only measure abilities that are
necessary upon entry to the job. The hiring authority (SME) is
responsible for developing, and preparing the instructions for
completing the exercise. The SME then completes the problem analysis
assignment, which is used to develop the scoring key.
Developing the scoring
key
Based on the SME’s completed exercise the scoring key is
developed primarily by using the SME’s judgment and the job analysis.
The exercise is usually scored along two general criteria: 1)
recognition and level of analysis of problem; and 2) quantity and
quality of problem solution. Rating scales are used to rate each of the
criteria to obtain a numeric score. The rating scales should be defined
by benchmarks for each criterion. Benchmarks are suggested answers to
the questions that are linked to the rating scale. Benchmarks provide an
objective and consistent reference for assessing the candidate’s
responses. There should usually be at least three suggested answers for
each sub-criterion: a superior, a satisfactory, and an unsatisfactory
response to develop benchmarks, using the guide below, ask SMEs to
create answers that fit the different levels of the rating scale.
5— What would one
expect or want an outstanding candidate to give as the best possible
answer?
4—
3— What is an
acceptable answer that one would expect a qualified candidate to give?
2—
1— What would one
expect as a poor answer from a candidate who has little or no knowledge
or skill on this job requirement?
Problem Analysis
Exercise Administration
Depending on the difficulty of the exercise, candidates
should be scheduled ten minutes to one hour before the interview. The
exercise administration should take place in a quiet room or cube
containing a pad of paper and other office supplies. It is suggested
that the exercise be administered by someone who is not taking part in
the interview process. Depending on the level of difficulty of the
exercise, the exercise administrator may or may not read the specific
instructions for the exercise to candidate. In higher level exercises it
is recommended that the candidate just be handed a written set of
instructions to read and interpret on their own. When the candidate has
five minutes remaining to complete the exercise, the exercise
administrator may wish to give the candidate a five-minute warning. When
the time limit has expired or the candidate finishes the exercise, the
exercise administrator will collect the candidate’s instructions and
allow the candidate to take their notes into the interview room. It is
highly recommended that the problem analysis exercise be the first
question in the interview.
Exercise Scoring
If a panel
scores the exercise and interview they should be trained. After scoring
all candidates, the panel should review their individual ratings as a
group and make sure that there is a consensus on each criterion. For
example, on a scale of 1 to 5, if one rater gave a 4, one a 3, and the
other a 1 on the same criterion, this might indicate some rater bias or
misunderstanding of the candidate’s comments. All raters should be no
more than one point away from all other raters’ scores. For example, it
would be acceptable to have two 3s and a 2 given on the same criterion.
If raters find that there is not a consensus on a criterion, they should
discuss the reasons for their ratings and attempt to reach a consensus.
The results of the interview and exercise may be combined at this point.
|